Things I like RSS

Katrin's not-so-random tidbits and musings about tech, social change, life, and laughing.

Archive

Mar
9th
Fri
permalink

An Online Advocacy Code of Ethics

The disrespectful, condescending, and untruthful #Kony2012 video first enraged me (to the point of trolling an email list in fury), and then made me think.  While masterfully pernicious in its story-telling, it embodies much that is wrong with online advocacy: deceptive manipulation of emotions, oversimplification and omission of facts to create the narrative, and utter disrespect towards those on whose behalf this particular group purports to advocate.  

I am deliberately not linking to it here - it does not need more coverage. Google it if you have no idea what I am talking about. 

I was arguing via email with people who made me want to bang my head against a wall.  

Online campaigners on the list were enamored by the 37+ million views of the video, the presumably many dollars donated to the group, and the possibly eventual policy impact the group may achieve (which may or may not have unintended consequences for the Ugandan individuals in question).  

They argued that the ‘awareness’ raised by so many people watching this video was phenomenal.  They loved the tactics proposed - the plastering of walls in the middle of the night, the action kit, the bracelets - as ‘engaging.’  

I tried, admittedly clumsily, to make a point that there is more to tactics and effective messaging in online advocacy - that there has to be some measure of ethics and morality, a commitment to honesty, and respect for those on whose behalf advocacy is conducted. (And yes, advocacy, by definition and unlike organizing, is ‘for’ and ‘on behalf’ of others.)  

So, why not a code of conduct, a code of ethics for online advocates and online campaigners who work for and on behalf of specific groups of people within the realm of social causes.  

PR people have a code of ethics, online marketers do, advertisers certainly do - so why not the people who are marketers, PR people, advertisers, campaigners but for causes and social issues.

So, here it goes. It is short, to the point and may be missing some things or get some stuff wrong. It’s not the end, it’s the beginning.  It’s meant to spark discussion so that #Kony2012 won’t happen again - at least not this way.  

One caveat - I am not really an online campaigner. I run some nonprofit projects that essentially live online and so play one some of the time. It’s not my full-time job and I am probably not even very good at it, compared to the people who live and breathe online comms for causes. If you are, and I get it wrong, please fix it! 

Lastly, special thanks for Lina Srivastava who helped clarify several points in the middle of the night. 

An Online Advocacy Code of Conduct

Definition: “Advocacy is a political process by an individual or a group that aims to influence public-policy and resource allocation decisions within political, economic, and social systems and institutions.” (wikipedia)

Respectful and ethical advocacy works in partnership with the people it supports, and ultimately takes their side. Advocacy promotes social inclusion, equality and social justice.

Online advocacy, specifically, involves taking existing advocacy work to the Web, email, all social media, and any other online channels, creating new ways to gain support for the specific issues, cause, or individuals.


Preamble

We, as online campaigners, understand that we serve the public interest by acting as responsible advocates for the people, organizations, and issues that we represent.

Our work is guided by: Respect for the people on whose behalf we advocate and the audience we are trying to engage; relevance of the issues and proposed solutions to the people on whose behalf we advocate, and resonance with their identity, culture, and recognized challenges.

We further provide an accurate and truthful voice in the marketplace of ideas, facts, and viewpoints in support of an informed public debate, and an engaged and active citizenry. 

Our Conduct Must be Guided By:

1. Integrity: First, do no Harm. This means consciously avoiding harmful actions, omissions, or unintended consequences of information and campaigns.

2. Respect: We recognize that our work is best served by respecting the agency and ultimate self-advocacy of the individuals or groups on whose behalf we advocate. We also recognize that our field is best served when we respect the audiences we target to make informed and intelligent choices about the causes and issues they engage in. In online advocacy campaigns, we do not condone depictions that in any way undermine human dignity or any form of discrimination, including that based upon race, national origin, religion, sex or age. We do not condone playing on fear or superstition in online advocacy campaigns.

3. Honesty: In all of our online advocacy campaigns, we promote honesty and transparency in our practices and methods. Information that we provide in all forms of online communications should be legal, decent, honest and truthful. Information provided as part of online advocacy campaigns should not contain any statement or visual presentation which directly or by implication, omission, ambiguity or exaggerated claim is likely to mislead our intended audience.

We believe that online advocacy is a creative endeavor that strives to convince our audience that our issues and causes are important, necessary, or valuable but we reject all forms of deception of manipulation in the process of engaging with our audience. We further believe that it is imperative to be accurate in all communications, to act promptly to correct erroneous communications, to investigate the truthfulness and accuracy of information released by us on behalf of organizations that we work for, to clearly reveal the sponsors for causes and the interests represented, and to disclose any financial interests we might have (such as consulting contracts) with organizations or causes that we represent.

4. Responsibility: We believe that working with or in any way targeting vulnerable populations such as children and youth requires particular sensitivity and care, given their particular credulity and inexperience.

5. Privacy: We respect the privacy of of our audience as well as those of our beneficiaries, and encourage practices that promote the most effective means to promote such privacy.

This includes but is not limited to: Information collected from audiences should be confidential and used only for expressed purposes. All data, especially confidential data, should be safeguarded against unauthorized access. The expressed wishes of others with regard to any communication should be respected via opt-in communications with clear ways to opt out. We also note that it is critical for us to abide by respectful and privacy-protecting use of images, video, and audio, especially of children or other vulnerable populations.

Comments (View)
Dec
26th
Mon
permalink

The protest at @Сахарова, Russia in Lego. Udaltsova as a skeleton. 

Comments (View)
Aug
30th
Tue
permalink

El Rego - the James Brown of Benin. 

Comments (View)
May
14th
Fri
permalink

Used Sex Toys for Africa. Yes.

From an email I received today that is just too beautiful to not share.

katrin,

thank you so much for inviting me tonight. looking forward to it…

and i’ve been thinking. all of us ‘do gooders’ in one room, we should not miss the opportunity to help and save the have nots


i’d like to propose a last minute addition to your party tonight, a fundraising drive for all attendees to bring something used that can then get dumped in Africa

so as to adhere to best practices, i’ve identified a core need inflicting the people of the nation of Africa and I have a great strategy.

a used sex toy donation drive!! 

you see, after the needy ‘others’ receive their newfound clitoris via Clitoraid, they are going to want to feel sexy. 1 million used t shirts just won’t meet the need.

and perhaps toss in a partnership with @solarafrica to promote longterm solar alternatives to battery operated pleasure devices.  maybe toss a micro-finance program them in their to boot, for good measure

i know, i know, it’s amazing no one else thought of this. but truth is, i came on this earth with a mission to save other people and now i finally know how.


and you can help! we’ll need some marketing since this is sooo last minute, but didn’t jason sadler say he is a marketer, and that the ‘aid community’ is not embracing of his maddeningly brilliant skills?

bingo!

:)

see you tonight…bringing my red nipple tassels from my studio 54 days. i hear if you wear them out in the field and put deet on them, they are more effective than malaria nets

Comments (View)
Apr
30th
Fri
permalink

Here is the recording of the #swedow / #1millionshirts / #smartaid call, April 30 2010.  People also transcribed/took extensive notes of the call here.

For much background reading on what has been said in the debate about a million shirts shipped to Africa, there is a summary of links here.

I am sure there will be more posts in the next 24 hours! Thank to all of you who partook in the call!

Comments (View)
Apr
27th
Tue
permalink
Interesting discussion about the brilliant “Design for the First World” on an MIT Media Lab list. One comment: “I suppose it’s tangential to the point she’s trying to make (which I agree is very cool), but neoliberal fat phobia is all wrapped up in the design of this project, and it’s not ok. There ought to be many better (and less sexist) ways to encapsulate the idea besides the one in which the thin, beautiful, underfed developing world saves our fat, lazy asses.”
The person quoted then posts some links:
http://kateharding.net/faq/but-dont-you-realize-fat-is-unhealthy/http://jezebel.com/5356697/fat-vs-fictionhttp://www.nyupress.org/books/The_Fat_Studies_Reader-products_id-11104.html
What do you think?  Great point of Dx1W, wrong image?

Interesting discussion about the brilliant “Design for the First World” on an MIT Media Lab list. One comment: “I suppose it’s tangential to the point she’s trying to make (which I agree is very cool), but neoliberal fat phobia is all wrapped up in the design of this project, and it’s not ok. There ought to be many better (and less sexist) ways to encapsulate the idea besides the one in which the thin, beautiful, underfed developing world saves our fat, lazy asses.”


The person quoted then posts some links:

http://kateharding.net/faq/but-dont-you-realize-fat-is-unhealthy/
http://jezebel.com/5356697/fat-vs-fiction
http://www.nyupress.org/books/The_Fat_Studies_Reader-products_id-11104.html

What do you think?  Great point of Dx1W, wrong image?

Comments (View)
Apr
17th
Sat
permalink
Comments (View)
permalink
Comments (View)
Nov
9th
Mon
permalink
Comments (View)
Oct
25th
Sun
permalink

Brilliant quote:

“There are two kinds of political activists. The first kind, the kind who changes the world, points to something that seriously needs to be seen, and cries out, “Look at this.”

The second kind, the kind who changes nothing, barks in a voice every bit as insistent, “Look at me.”

Who are you?

Comments (View)